Declaration of Conformity with the German Corporate Governance Code
pursuant to § 161 of the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG)
The Board of Management and Supervisory Board of HORNBACH HOLDING Aktiengesellschaft hereby declare pursuant to § 161 of the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) that the recommendations of the “German Corporate Governance Code” in the version dated May 26, 2010 and published in the electronic Federal Official Gazette on July 2, 2010 have basically been met since the previous Declaration of Conformity and continue to be met. Application was not and is not made of the recommendations included in Points 2.3.3 Sentence 2, 3.8 Paragraph 3, 4.1.5, 4.2.3 Paragraphs 4 and 5, 5.3.3, 5.4.1 Paragraphs 2 and 3, and 5.4.6 Paragraph 3 Sentences 1 and 2.
The aforementioned deviations from the recommendations have arisen on account of the following considerations:
a) Point 2.3.3 Sentence 2:
The Articles of Association of HORNBACH HOLDING Aktiengesellschaft do not provide for the possibility of postal votes, as a result of which it is legally not possible to organize a postal vote. However, shareholders are assisted in exercising their voting rights by a voting proxy appointed by HORNBACH HOLDING Aktiengesellschaft and by the provision in line with legal requirements of forms to issue powers of attorney for the Annual General Meeting.
b) Point 3.8 Paragraph 3:
In Point 3.8, Paragraph 3, the Code recommends agreeing a specified deductible in any D&O insurance policy to be taken out for supervisory board members. For supervisory board members as well, this should be based on the legal requirements for management board members arising due to the Act on the Appropriateness of Management Board Compensation (VorstAG) dated July 31, 2009. No such deductible has been agreed at the expense of members of the Supervisory Board. This would reduce the attractiveness of Supervisory Board activities, and thus also the company’s chances in the competition to attract qualified candidates. The recommendation made in Point 3.8 Paragraph 3 has therefore not been and is not followed.
c) Point 4.2.3 Paragraphs 4 and 5:
No application has been or is made of the recommendations included in Point 4.2.3 Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Code (“severance pay cap”). The deviation to Point 4.2.3 Paragraphs 4 and 5 is due to competition-related factors. Apart from that, it still has to be definitively clarified whether and how the recommendations included in Point 4.2.3 Paragraph 4 are legally enforceable.
d) Point 5.3.3:
In Point 5.3.3, the Code recommends that the supervisory board should form a nomination committee composed exclusively of shareholder representatives which proposes suitable candidates to the supervisory board for its election proposals to the Annual General Meeting. The company’s Supervisory Board has not formed such a committee. Based on our experience to date, the establishment of such a committee would not appear to be necessary.
e) Point 5.4.1 Paragraphs 2 and 3 and Point 4.1.5:
The company deviates from the recommendations made in Points 5.4.1 Paragraph 2 and 3 and in Point 4.1.5. In the composition of its Board of Management and Supervisory Board, as well as of other management positions, HORNBACH HOLDING Aktiengesellschaft accords priority above all to the knowledge, ability and expert experience required of the individuals in question.
f) Point 5.4.6 Paragraph 3 Sentence 1:
In Point 5.4.6 Paragraph 3 Sentence 1, the Code recommends that the compensation of supervisory board members be reported in the corporate governance report on an individual basis and broken down into its constituent components. Given that the compensation of the Supervisory Board is governed by the Articles of Association, we see no necessity for the disclosure of individual compensation packages.
g) Point 5.4.6 Paragraph 3 Sentence 2:
In Point 5.4.6 Paragraph 3 Sentence 2, the Code further recommends that compensation paid or benefits granted by the company to supervisory board members for services rendered personally, especially advisory and mediation services, are to be reported separately in the corporate governance report on an individual basis. HORNBACH HOLDING Aktiengesellschaft makes use in one case of the opportunity of drawing on the expertise of a member of the Supervisory Board in specific areas. This compensation is undertaken on the basis of symbolic compensation. Furthermore, the company also draws on the services of a law firm to which another Supervisory Board member belongs in return for customary market fees. Here, the Supervisory Board has adopted a resolution pursuant to § 114 of the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG). We see no need to provide individual disclosures in this respect.
Neustadt an der Weinstrasse, December 21, 2011
HORNBACH HOLDING Aktiengesellschaft
The Supervisory Board The Board of Management
|
Archive
Statement of Compliance
2010
(as of 2010/12/17; PDF, 26 KB)
2009
(as of 2009/12/18; PDF, 23 KB)
2009
(as of 2009/05/20; PDF, 22 KB)
2008
(as of 2008/12/17; PDF, 26 KB)
2007
(as of 2007/12/04; PDF, 24 KB)
2006
(as of 2006/12/06; PDF, 23 KB)
2005
(as of 2005/12/08; PDF, 46 KB)
2004
(as of 2004/12/09; PDF, 22 KB)
2003
(as of 2003/11/26; PDF, 24 KB)
2002
(as of 2002/11/27; PDF, 12 KB)
|
